W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: multiple-graph example in the Primner

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:58:55 +0100
Message-ID: <52A88BBF.9030800@emse.fr>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
You can interpret dataset in whatever way you like. But your neighbour 
can too, so there is little chance your interpretations will be 
compatible in any way, unless you have out-of-band agreement to use 
compatible interpretation.

If you want, the graph name denotes a graph, and this: <> denotes a 
WebSource, but if you want, a graph name denotes the universe and <> 
denotes a fish. The second would be considered, probably, bad practice, 
but RDF 1.1 does not make recommendations in terms of best practices.


AZ

Le 11/12/2013 16:42, Markus Lanthaler a écrit :
> On Saturday, December 07, 2013 5:02 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> [...]
>> I'd propose it's the dataset (<>) that's the WebSource, not /bob that's
>> the WebSource.   Pat can correct me, but my sense is that nothing we say
>> about the thing denoted by the graph name can affect what we're saying
>> about the associated graph or how they are connected.   To say
>> something
>> about how the graph name's denotation and the associated graph are
>> related, we have to say something about the dataset itself.
>
> Pat, is that true? If so, why?
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 15:59:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:36 UTC