W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: RDF/XML as Proposed Edited Rec

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:30:05 +0100
Message-ID: <52A876ED.8030402@vu.nl>
To: Fabien Gandon <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Fabien,

I added one note to the Plain Literal Event section.

WG: I think the RDF-XML document is now ready for review.

   https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-xml/index.html

Guus

PS Fabien: I think you should really be first editor. Changed assuming 
you would agree.




On 10-12-13 16:01, Fabien Gandon wrote:
> Hi Guus,
>
> Changes 5 and 6 are done (revisions 1512 and 1513)
> Changes 7 and 8 are abandoned.
> I updated section C.1 accordingly (revisions 1514) and the wiki page for changes.
> I reviewed the intro and the extensive changes you made (revision 1515)
> I also added you as first editor since you made many many edits.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Guus Schreiber" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
>> À: "Fabien Gandon" <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>
>> Cc: "RDF WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
>> Envoyé: Mercredi 27 Novembre 2013 22:47:51
>> Objet: RDF/XML as Proposed Edited Rec
>>
>> Hi Fabien,
>>
>> I promised to llok at the changes you proposed:
>>
>> * Changes 1-4: editorial, fine
>> * Change 5: datatyped empty literals & Change 6: ID and datatype
>> exclusion on literal property: These are essentially bug fixes.
>> Proposed
>> fix looks goud.
>> * Change 7: HTML5 in RDF-XML. Your prosoal is to just include
>> examples
>> of HTML using CDATA. Fine by me, but doing nothing would also be
>> fine.
>> * Change 8: named graph support in RDF-XML. This is a clear "no
>> change".
>>
>> Other changes needed:
>> * replace "RDF URI reference" with "IRI"
>> * change references and links, where possible, to RDF 1.1 docs
>>
>> Guus
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 14:30:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:36 UTC