W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: RDF 1.1 Primer

From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:12:25 +0000
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: "'Pierre-Antoine Champin'" <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "'Guus Schreiber'" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1386259944.8808.16.camel@RD000190>
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:26 +0100, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 6:21 PM, Yves Raimond wrote:
> > > It should be noted that the @context would usually be provided as an
> > > IRI, or even hidden in the HTTP headers, leaving only the "nice" JSON
> > > to be seen.
> > >
> [...]
> > It's now in mercurial - and an additional one with a remote context,
> > which makes the JSON pretty nice to look at.
> There's a typo in example 11, line 2. It has to be @context (the "@" is missing).

Fixed now - thank you.

> I think it would be much more inviting if you would use example 11 as first example in section C.2 JSON-LD, then show the context and mention that it can also be embedded directly in the document and that prefixes can be used the same way as in Turtle and use the multiple-graphs example to illustrate it. I've cleaned up the examples and the context and attached all of them in a single file.

That's a very good point Markus - I think it depends where these
examples are in the document. If they stay where they are, as
Pierre-Antoine, says, then I think it makes sense in the context of the
other examples. If it's earlier in the document (i.e. section 5) then it
makes sense. I'd be quite up for that (it originally was there,
actually) - Guus, what do you think?


> > One quick question - any
> > reason for mapping uri to @id instead of just reusing @id?
> As Pierre-Antoine already said it has advantages when working with the data but I nevertheless think we probably should stick to @id and @type in the primer as these are really advanced features.
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 16:20:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:36 UTC