Re: delay in publication WDs

Argh - a typo introduced when putting in all the anchors for sections.  :-(

Fixed now.

peter

On 04/04/2013 05:40 AM, Schreiber, A.T. wrote:
> On 4 apr. 2013, at 01:42, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm,  everything looks OK for Semantics, but the checker is complaining.  Maybe someone else can take a quick look to see what is going on.
>>
>> peter
> Diabolical. It seems the ReSpec script still generates two errors: a https instead of http link for the W3C style shhet and logo. Took me some time to spot that. Sigh.
>
> Peter: there is one broken link left: the D_entailment anchor. That should be the last. Could you fix that? I will take it from there.
>
> Guus
>> On 04/03/2013 09:33 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I've written a short wiki page with tips for publishing ReSpec docs:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_documents
>>>
>>> For those of you with more experience with ReSpec: please check/correct.
>>>
>>> Peter: we have a local copy of the biblio file in our repository, see the wiki page.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> Guus
>>>
>>> On 03-04-13 18:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>> I fixed the internal links in Semantics, commenting out many of them.
>>>>
>>>> Semantics now has [[...]] for RDF-PLAIN-LITERAL and RDF-VOCABULARY,
>>>> neither of which appear to exist in the DB.   If someone points me at
>>>> the DB I can try to fix these as well.
>>>>
>>>> peter
>>>>
>>>> On 04/03/2013 08:04 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> There were some problems with publishing the 4 FPWDs:
>>>>>
>>>>> - we're using an out-of-date version of ResPec
>>>>> - docs were not pu-rules compliant [1]. I did not have time to
>>>>> ccorrect all of them, in particular the broken links in the Semantics
>>>>> document.
>>>>>
>>>>> Guus

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 14:01:56 UTC