- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:53:32 -0600
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 25 Oct 2012, at 09:20, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > On 25/10/12 15:25, Steve Harris wrote: >> In principle I'm +1 on this, but we don't use default/anonymous graphs either, so I'd like to hear from people who do. Would this would be an OK solution? >> > > what are you suggesting? > > - TriG not to have a default graph > or > - making the examples of metadata not use the default graph. I wasn't suggesting either - I was wondering what the impact of not having an explicit syntax for representing the default graph would be on users of systems like that. - Steve > Andy > >> It would certainly simplify the spec text, and it would make the parallel with NQuads more obvious. >> >> I have no feel for how many TriG files there out in the wild with anonymous graph contents. >> >> - Steve >> >> On 24 Oct 2012, at 17:29, Yves Raimond wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> Just jumping on the last point that was mentioned in today's telecon, about possibly not providing any statements about what to do with a TriG default graph. I have the feeling that not doing that actually defeats the point of having a default graph at all. >>> >>> If we can't get to an agreement on that first point, I'd really like to understand what the rationale is behind supporting default graphs in TriG, apart from backward-compatibility. When used at the BBC, default graphs have proven to be a very confusing feature, and not having any statement on what do with them would only add to the confusion. >>> >>> All the dataset metadata that is supposed to go in that default graph could perfectly go in another named graph, e.g. identified by the URI of the sd:Dataset in the SPARQL end-point you're generating a TriG dump from, or the URI of the TriG file itself. Personally, I'd favour a 'flat' version of TriG, where everything is a named graph. >>> >>> Best, >>> Yves >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------- >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk >>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and >>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >>> If you have received it in >>> error, please delete it from your system. >>> Do not use, copy or disclose the >>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender >>> immediately. >>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails >>> sent or received. >>> Further communication will signify your consent to >>> this. >>> ----------------------------- >> > -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:54:05 UTC