- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:02:36 +0200
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 23-10-2012 14:50, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active? All, We stressed this some time ago in the WG telecon: pls refrain from talking about "formal objection", unless we are at the *end* of the consensus process. Michael had a valid concern which is being addressed. That's all. And let's please change the subject line. Guus > > A FO that never has been raised can neither be active nor withdrawn, but it looks like we're starting to get somewhere. Richard seems to be on it, work-item wise? > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel.: +353 91 495730 > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > On 23 Oct 2012, at 12:38, Nathan wrote: > >> Michael Hausenblas wrote: >>>> You're prepared to categorically exclude certain technologies from the set of standards that constitutes Linked Data. I'm not. >>> +1 >> >> What's the likely hood of this Formal Objection happening then? withdrawn or still active? >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 13:03:14 UTC