- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:58:50 +0200
- To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, "'Peter Patel-Schneider'" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 12:19 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Oct 20, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > @graph is not needed "to express a set of JSON-LD node definitions > that may > > not be directly related to one another". This wording should be > changed. > > It should definitely defer to the RDF Concepts discussion on named > graphs, as this is purely a JSON-LD syntactic expression. Agreed, this was quite confusing. I tried to improve it [1] but that section probably needs some more love. Best, Markus [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/dc9e1d268af9f204f94b7f100514cd cc42082f43 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 21:59:19 UTC