- From: François Daoust <francois@joshfire.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:19:23 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: [...] > Agenda > > 1. ISSUE-168: JSON-LD Syntax document MUST utilize the RDF definitions > * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/168 > 2. ISSUE-156: Compact API first expands without provided context > * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/156 > 3. ISSUE-162: Base IRI used to expand @type? > * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/162 > 4. ISSUE-159: Add specifying @language to expanded form > * https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/159 Note I also created ISSUE-166 to propose a Conformance section and ensure consistency in the use of normative language throughout the spec: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/166 This is not entirely unrelated to the other issues at stake, e.g. because of its possible consequences on section 3.1 JSON-LD Data Model Francois. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ >
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 08:19:52 UTC