W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: partial comments on JSON-LD document

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:29:39 -0400
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <58840392-BB65-43F3-9A01-6AC99EEC50F7@greggkellogg.net>
On Oct 21, 2012, at 1:47 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:

> On 20 Oct 2012, at 23:19, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>> From a note in 3.4 [3]:
>> [[[
>> The null value is processed in a special way in JSON-LD. Unless otherwise specified, a JSON-LD processor must act as if a key-value pair in the body of a JSON-LD document was never declared when the value equals null. If @value, @list, or @set is set to null in expanded form, then the entire JSON object is ignored. If @context is set to null, the active context is reset and when used within a context, it removes any definition associated with the key, unless otherwise specified.
>> ]]]
> By the way: Using RFC2119 keywords in Notes is nonsensical. The role of a Note is to provide non-normative explanations within a normative section. Putting conformance statements into a Note is fundamentally wrong.
> Or perhaps MUST in JSON-LD doesn't mean the same as MUST in other W3C specifications? Or unlike in other W3C specifications, Notes are in fact normative in JSON-LD? We will never know, since there is no Conformance section.

No, they mean the same things, but the text should be moved out of the Note.


> Bet,
> Richard
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 17:30:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:22 UTC