W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: regrets for today

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:01:33 -0400
Message-ID: <506C453D.9040806@thefigtrees.net>
To: Souripriya Das <SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
My regrets as well for today.

Of the proposals in the agenda:

*PROPOSED: Implementations that parse and store information from TriG 
documents MAY turn the TriG default graph into a named graph with a name 
chosen in an implementation-dependent way. *

I guess I'm neutral on this. This is pretty much what Anzo does, but it 
seems pretty unhelpful for a specification to say this from an 
interoperability standpoint./

*PROPOSED: The WG suggests it's a good practice to put metadata about a 
TriG document in the document's default graph. *

I don't agree with this (see other recent thread), but I won't object to it.

*PROPOSED: This Working Group will not provide a Formal Semantics for 
RDF Datasets or for our Dataset Syntax (eg trig). In the future, the WG 
will decide whether to include something simple (relevant to datasets) 
in the RDF 1.1 Semantics, such as [ <N, G> name-entails <N', G'> just 
when N=N' and G entails G'. ] and the WG may publish some information 
about dataset semantics in WG NOTES. *

I'm ok with this.


On 10/3/2012 9:54 AM, Souripriya Das wrote:
> Regrets for today's meeting (busy at Oracle Open World this morning). -- Souri.
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 14:02:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:21 UTC