Re: opacity

On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:31 -0500, David Wood wrote:
> 
> > I'm not attached to either answer at this point.  I think there is a
> > strong use case for de dicto functionality, but I think it can be
> > provided with strings holding RDF graph serializations, if it's not
> > provided by the multigraph syntax.
> 
> 
> That's interesting.  I understood Andy's proposal to be strongly de
> re.

"Andy's proposal" meaning
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-Designs#Typed_Labels
?

Or the "Islands" concept?

    - s

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 15:59:13 UTC