- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:41:08 +0100
- To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org, danny.ayers@gmail.com, gavin@carothers.name, eric@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 13:43:00 UTC
The obvious issue is that this will break older turtle processors. That being said, we already have a backward incompatible feature, ie, @base... Ivan On Feb 7, 2012, at 14:12 , William Waites wrote: > >>> One use case for multi-line (block) comments is mixing text and >>> data notes in the same document and being easily able to >>> separate out the two later (see earlier posts in this >>> thread). When quickly jotting notes the # is inconvenient/ugly >>> and block comments make convenient chunks for extraction. > > I could see this being very useful for vocabulary authors, with > comment and data/code conventions to make good quality documentation > for humans. Considered at the surface syntax level, we can still have > the author's intended ordering and such to make the resulting docs > more readable. > > +1 to block comments. > > -w ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 13:43:00 UTC