- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:02:39 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <503E20FF.4060400@openlinksw.com>
On 8/29/12 10:00 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > On 2012-08-29, at 14:02, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 29 August 2012, Steve Harris wrote: >> >> On 2012-08-29, at 13:26, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday, 29 August 2012, Yves Raimond wrote: >>> >>> Hello! >>> >>> A colleague of mine was writing a specification generation >>> software for web ontologies recently, and as part of his >>> testing on multiple RDFS vocabularies, noticed that most of >>> them use the OWL namespace just for its owl:Ontology class, >>> to describe the vocabulary itself. >>> >>> Would it make sense to create a new rdfs:Schema class, to >>> make it simpler for people to create basic vocabularies, >>> without having to involve OWL at all? >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion. I would advise against this: >>> >>> 1. There are lots of bits of OWL that it is good to use, even if >>> you don't buy the whole DL vision. For example, knowing about >>> class disjointness, property inverses, FPs and IFPs. Having the >>> OWL 'Ontology' class can serve as a gateway drug to these useful >>> extras. >>> >>> 2. You push work onto consumers; everyone who previously queried >>> for owl: Ontology would now have to check for rdfs: Schema too. >>> >>> 3. Are there any members of one of these classes that are not >>> also in the other? If yes, I fear this will confuse. If no, then >>> this is purely cosmetics. >> >> +1 >> >>> 4. Both owl: and rdfs: are pre-declared prefixes in the rdfa 1.1 >>> 'initial context', and this addresses most of the cosmetic >>> concern. New schemas ought to be written in rdfa imho. >> >> That made me double-take, but I've not seen a schema written in >> RDFa to see how legible that can be. >> >> >> >> http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html >> >> http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ > > [sorry, this is quite off-topic] > > That's not bad at all, but I think I prefer holding the master in > Turtle and rendering it with some RDF→HTML tech à la > http://lv2plug.in/ns/lv2core/ +1 > > - Steve > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO > Garlik, a part of Experian > +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 > Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, > NG80 1ZZ > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 14:03:07 UTC