- From: Yves Raimond <Yves.Raimond@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:17:11 +0100
- To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Nicholas Humfrey <Nicholas.Humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 12:17:52 UTC
Hello! A colleague of mine was writing a specification generation software for web ontologies recently, and as part of his testing on multiple RDFS vocabularies, noticed that most of them use the OWL namespace just for its owl:Ontology class, to describe the vocabulary itself. Would it make sense to create a new rdfs:Schema class, to make it simpler for people to create basic vocabularies, without having to involve OWL at all? Best, Yves http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 12:17:52 UTC