- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:30:06 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5034ECEE.90005@openlinksw.com>
On 8/22/12 10:00 AM, Yves Raimond wrote: >> >@rev is a good example. There's cases in RDFa where it reduces the complexity (well, at least number of bytes) of saying things a lot, but it causes a lot of confusion in people new to RDFa. RDF is complex enough as it is IMHO. >> > > Yes, it's definitely a trade-off, but IMHO the balance tends towards adding a mechanism similar to @rev in Turtle. > > Best, > Yves > +1 Remember, the fact that it becomes part of the standard doesn't mean its an entry point re. usage. The benefit here is that you end up with syntax sugar awaiting the fully engaged end-user. As I said in an earlier post, one an end-user is engaged they make a quantum leap for bashful neophyte to edge-case maniac. It happens all the time with software. Thus, why not have a pleasant surprise (in the form of syntax sugar) in place for this inevitability? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 14:28:52 UTC