- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:23:28 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <502EB650.2050404@openlinksw.com>
On 8/17/12 4:33 PM, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>>> You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) >>>>> associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of >>>>> an IRI). How about that? > ... >>> +0.5 - the terms seem okay as long as there's a good story for the difference >>> between a "data source" and a "dataset", and between a "dataset" and a "triple >>> collection". > ... >> Yes. >> >> Data Source -- where you get the data from >> Dataset -- an actual collection of triples. >> >> Thus, you can have a single Data Source Name associated with one or >> more datasets; which can also be associated with one or more >> triples. > So a Data Source Name can "be associated with" either a collection of triples > (Dataset or Triple Collection) or with individual triples? Not individual triples. It could apply to individual quads. Which ultimately introduces a graph group identifier, which can still act as a Data Source Group Name. > Triples, either > individually or in collections, can be said to have a (named) Data Source? A Data Source Name can denote what might be generally perceived as a container (or a dataset) comprised of one or more triples. Same applies (as per statement above) to Data Source Group Names which can still pass as Data Source Names for short etc.. > > Tom > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 21:21:53 UTC