Re: complete graphs

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: complete graphs
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:31:26 -0500

[...]

> The restriction on the fourth column is that the fourth column is the
> web address of a place (a g-box) currently serving that triple.
> (That's the architecture I'm arguing for in this morning's post to
> public-rdf-prov [1].)

You are going to build this into the formal meaning of RDF?
That's a non-starter for me.

> The issue about completeness is that if I want to say, as in [1], that I
> agree or disagree with a statement (or otherwise build on it), it's
> important the readers see the whole statement (or know that they are
> seeing only a partial statement).  It's even more important for me to
> know if I'm seeing the whole statement before I say if I agree.

Please, let's try to be more precise.  In particular, there is
rdf:Statement, so "statement" is something that has to be carefully
used.

>       -- Sandro
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-prov/2011Sep/0023


peter

Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 12:45:48 UTC