On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:16 PM, William Waites <ww@styx.org> wrote: > >>>>> "cygri" == Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> writes: > > cygri> Regrets for today. I'm at a project meeting. > > Likewise for me, unfortunately... > > Regrets from me again I'm afraid. > cygri> I'd like to see a check for consensus for 2d. > > Personally I still favour 3a then 3b and am not really convinced by the > "modelling languages is hard" and "using the datatype machinery in anger > is risky" arguments. > I am still unclear on the use case for changing the behaviour of literals. I couldn't find one or background on how it got onto the charter to help me understand the purpose of changing literal datatypes. My vote, as I expressed on the recent poll, would be for no change at all. Ian -- Ian Davis, Chief Technology Officer, Talis Group Ltd. http://www.talis.com/ | Registered in England and Wales as 5382297
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:41:23 UTC