- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:57:17 -0700
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> >> On 24 Sep 2011, at 10:41, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>> Is there any statement on the HTML level that is inherited by the turtle >>> part? The only thing that you refer to is the character encoding of the >>> page. What about: >>> >>> - document base URI? Is this also a base for the enclosed Turtle? (In my >>> opinion: yes) >> >> +1 > > consider: > > <script src="/foo/bar" type="text/turtle"></script> That form is not allowed by HTML. Guess we need to be specific in Turtle? "When used to include data blocks (as opposed to scripts), the data must be embedded inline, the format of the data must be given using the type attribute, the src attribute must not be specified, and the contents of the script element must conform to the requirements defined for the format used." > > I'd suggest a best practise note to include a @base in the turtle itself, or > to use the default namespace. > > Best, > > Nathan >
Received on Sunday, 25 September 2011 01:57:45 UTC