Re: my vote on the varieties of datatyped tagged literals


On 7 Sep 2011, at 16:40, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Option 2 might be worse than Option 1; to put it simply, it seems to be
> making tagged literals be datatyped literals by making up a new,
> different, *non-XML-standard* sort of datatyped literal.

This is not true for 2c.

It is compatible with the XSD notion of datatypes. That was the whole point.


Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 08:06:53 UTC