- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:10:51 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Apologies to Richard for not seeing the modification (B1y). I plead email overload. On 06/09/11 14:37, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> > It's also posisble to define STR() specifically for language tagged literals to mean the string part. > If you say, “STR() returns the lexical form of a literal” then it should be fine. Great - the current SPARQL 1.0 and 1.1 text is: "Returns the lexical form of ltrl (a literal);" > > Summary of proposal: > > rdf:langString typed literals are completely normal typed literals, except: > 1. they have a non-empty language tag besides the lexical form > 2. their lexical space is empty > 3. their value is not L2V(datatypeIRI)(lexicalForm) but instead a pair<lexicalForm, languageTag> That works for me. Minor tweaking for clarity: teh text in B1y is a it clearer 2. The lexical space of rdf:langString is empty. (It's the datatype that defines the lexcial space, not the literals themselves - this is quoting from B1y) Andy
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:11:32 UTC