- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:55:02 -0700
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
This is the use case that TopQuadrant has internally that prompted discussion between me and Gavin leading to this thread on this mailing list. A significant portion of our product source is in RDF. We are migrating our version control system to GIT to reduce cost of merging This will not work for RDF in the form that we currently store it, because simple changes result in completely different documents We are now working on a version of my earlier paper with additional steps to insure reasonable stability of blank node IDs. (In the terms of the paper the bnode ids will be based on a hashcode generated from the first distinctive triple for that bnode). This will then give, in the vast majority of cases, small changes to the RDF will result in small changes to the canonical form (larger changes will occur at discontinuities in the hashing algorithm, when the number of buckets need expanding) Jeremy
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 18:55:34 UTC