- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:36:48 +0200
- To: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- CC: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 06/14/2011 09:04 PM, Yves Raimond wrote: > Hello! > > Right after the RDF WG would probably suit me better, if we can keep > it relatively short. same for me pa > > Best, > Yves > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Lee suggested [1] that the RDF WG should look carefully at graph terminology being adopted by the SPARQL WG. This message suggests a telecon among interested parties to align graph terminology between the working groups. >> >> We can meet directly before the RDF telecon time on Wednesdays at 10:00 US EST, or at another time if you care to suggest. >> >> Please note that this completes Guus' action [2], which I think should have been given to me. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/58 >> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 19:37:33 UTC