W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2011

ISSUE-3: Between us, we need to study the feedback we got via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ on the previous round of specs (and errata)

From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:08:18 +0000
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PsICI-00074Q-IA@barney.w3.org>


ISSUE-3: Between us, we need to study the feedback we got via http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/ on the previous round of specs (and errata)

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/3

Raised by: 
On product:

Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 17:08:20 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sandro Hawke: "Re: ISSUE-2: Identifying a document"
Previous message: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider: "[Turtle] starting with http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:55 UTC