Re: Graph-State Resources from Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider on 2011-12-16 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from December 2011)

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:52:18 -0500
To: <sandro@w3.org>
CC: <phayes@ihmc.us>, <richard@cyganiak.de>, <david@3roundstones.com>, <timbl@w3.org>, <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20111216.075218.1638938366199112419.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Graph-State Resources (was Re: graphs and documents Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:21:26 -0600

> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:15 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> I see your reasoning, but these are all just too long and geeky, and
>unpronounceable. How about Thing Whose state Is a Graph, or TWIG. Then
>we can talk about RDF TWIGs, which trips off the tongue easily. 
> 
> Not bad.    Keep tryin'  :-)
> 
>      - s

I rather like this.  We could also have RDF LEAFs, RDF BRANCHes and RDG
TREEs, if only we could come up with good phrases for these to shorten.

peter

Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 12:53:12 UTC