- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:14:11 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 15/12/11 16:59, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2011Dec/0000.html > > The Redland parser has "%expect 2". Sorry that may not be clear. It says the parser generator should expect exactly 2 shift/reduce conflicts and not report anything if there are. http://www.gnu.org/s/bison/manual/bison.html#Expect-Decl > > > The grammar, as currently specified in the spec, is not LL(1). > > The SPARQL formulation does not require lookahead of greater than one. > We (DAWG and non-DAWG members) spent quite a long time on tuning the > grammar to work with minimal requirements. > > Andy > > On 13/12/11 20:41, Gavin Carothers wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> New Editors Draft of Turtle is up at the usual place >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html >> >> Included changes: >> >> Turtle in HTML >> N-Prime (N-Triples) >> Escapes in local part of Prefix Names >> Grammar bugs >> >> Cheers, >> Gavin >> >
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 17:14:38 UTC