- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:52:22 -0500
- To: <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <timbl@w3.org>
From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> Subject: Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:29:15 -0600 > Hi all, > > I had a lengthy conversation with TimBL about named graphs at the LEDP > Workshop [1] last week. Briefly, he feels that the semantics for > named graphs should work like this: > > - An RDF Graph is named via a URI. > - The URI denotes the RESTful Representation that is returned when the URI is resolved. > > That is, the URI denotes the graph's contents, not the graph Resource itself. > > How do Peter and Pat feel about that? I'm having problems wrapping my head around just what a RESTful Representation returned when resolving an IRI could be. Perhaps someone could enlighten me here. > TimBL: Please let us know if I misrepresented your position. > > Separately, Elsevier representatives Brad Allen and Alan Yagoda > informed me that by "named graphs" they mean an RDF Graph that is > referenced by a URI. Resolution of that URI returns the graph > contents (a g-text) via RESTful interaction. That would seem to be in > line with TimBL's preference. > > Regards, > Dave peter
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 13:51:45 UTC