- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:59:48 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-08-30, at 13:57, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 30 Aug 2011, at 08:56, Steve Harris wrote: >>> Could JSON-LD be changed so that one can define an “RDF geek compatibility context” that directly results in this convenient form, without need for post-processing? >> >> That immediately makes me think of the "XML friendly" striped syntax of RDF/XML, i.e. hurts everyone, all the time. > > I asked whether we can get a profile of JSON-LD that's isomorphic to Talis RDF/JSON. You'll have to expand a bit on why that would hurt everyone, all the time. Because it would be a "special profile" of JSON-LD, just like RDF/XML is a special profile of XML, or RSS 1.0 was a special profile of RDF/XML. Though RSS had a schema, so it's a little less painful. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:00:20 UTC