W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Can JSON-LD cater for Talis' RDF/JSON design goals?

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:59:48 +0100
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E006CB01-7500-47A6-9A8E-5175814BD271@garlik.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
On 2011-08-30, at 13:57, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 30 Aug 2011, at 08:56, Steve Harris wrote:
>>> Could JSON-LD be changed so that one can define an “RDF geek compatibility context” that directly results in this convenient form, without need for post-processing?
>> That immediately makes me think of the "XML friendly" striped syntax of RDF/XML, i.e. hurts everyone, all the time.
> I asked whether we can get a profile of JSON-LD that's isomorphic to Talis RDF/JSON. You'll have to expand a bit on why that would hurt everyone, all the time.

Because it would be a "special profile" of JSON-LD, just like RDF/XML is a special profile of XML, or RSS 1.0 was a special profile of RDF/XML. Though RSS had a schema, so it's a little less painful.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:08 UTC