W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Can JSON-LD cater for Talis' RDF/JSON design goals?

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:57:11 +0100
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-linked-json@w3.org
Message-Id: <D8BA78BE-EB45-42C2-9862-601954974CC7@cyganiak.de>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
On 30 Aug 2011, at 08:56, Steve Harris wrote:
>> Could JSON-LD be changed so that one can define an “RDF geek compatibility context” that directly results in this convenient form, without need for post-processing?
> That immediately makes me think of the "XML friendly" striped syntax of RDF/XML, i.e. hurts everyone, all the time.

I asked whether we can get a profile of JSON-LD that's isomorphic to Talis RDF/JSON. You'll have to expand a bit on why that would hurt everyone, all the time.

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 12:57:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:08 UTC