The content type suggested is: text/ntriples+turtle but text defaults to ASCII. N-triples is less readable than Turtle and more directed to machine processing. application/n-triples+turtle seems more appropriate and allows the default charset to be UTF-8. Andy On 24/08/11 00:52, Gavin Carothers wrote: > Hey folks, > > Have added an initial draft of N-Triples Prime (name to be agreed on > later) to a branch of the Turtle specification. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/n-triples/rdf-turtle/index.html > > Branch is named "n-triples". > > Issues: > The RDF WG has not settled on a name for N′, N′ is used to distinguish > it from the RDF Test Cases N-Triples. ( Should I say "N\u2032" ) > The RDF WG has specified N-Triples Prime to allow UTF-8 characters in > IRIs, literals and blank node identifiers. Readers with an opinion > about whether or not N-Triples should be ASCII-only may wish to > comment. (huh, that is poor language and not correct copied from old > issue, will fix later) > Current grammar doesn't deal with comments correctly. (For any value of correct) > Current grammar doesn't deal with triple lines that end in EOF rather > then EOL. (neither did the old one) > > Cheers, > Gavin >Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 12:27:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:08 UTC