- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:10:42 +0100
- To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Cc: Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 18:10, Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net> wrote: >> I guess that the link to an external @context could do the job. You >> can also have this context automatically generated by the app, that's >> how we're doing it in Seevl. > >> From my POV, removing all CURIES from the JSON itself, and >> keeping namespaces only in the context (ideally in an external >> document, so that the "data file" is completely namespace-less, as >> RDFa profiles) is the best way to reach Web-dev that are not semweb >> geeks. And the way RDF should go to have a JSON serialisation (and RDF >> data !) that can reach the masses. Strong +1. Context in the data file, and CURIEs everywhere, are two things that will not work, because they're noise when one looks with JSON goggles. > "Link headers, the mullet of the Web: business in the front, party in > the back. Idea: serve #JSON, make it #jsonLD by a @context Link > header." Are you talking about the Link: HTTP header? That doesn't make sense. Why would you use an HTTP header for something that's specific to a single representation format? What's the advantage over putting it into the representation format? Best, Richard
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 13:11:15 UTC