- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:31:06 -0500
- To: "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-text@w3.org
I agree. I also suggest change 4.2 to "Comparison function of rdf:text Values". On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org> wrote: > > ... > Shall we change the section heading > > == Functions and Operators on <tt>rdf:text</tt> == > > to > > == Functions on <tt>rdf:text</tt> == > > ? > > we don't define any operators, after I have removed "equal" > > best, > Axel > > Axel Polleres wrote: >> >> Added both. (sent a message confirming this earlier already, but not sure >> whether it got through, had some mail problem) >> >> Jos de Bruijn wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I propose to add the following two editor's notes to the rdf:text >>> document so that the document can be published before resolving the >>> issues I raised in my review of the document [1]. >>> >>> To section 3, below the specification of the lexical space, add an >>> editor's note with the following text: >>> >>> The definition of the set of characters, particularly the fact that it >>> is infinite, as well as the compatibility with xml string -- whether the >>> string part of the lex & val space should be the same as xs:string -- >>> are under discussion. >>> >>> To section 4.3.1 add an editor's note with the following text: >>> >>> The inclusion of text-length, as well as the definition of the function >>> -- what should be the length of an rdf:text value -- are under >>> discussion. >>> >>> >>> Best, Jos >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Axel Polleres > Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, > Galway > email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ > > -- Jie http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 16:31:43 UTC