- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:37:48 +0000
- To: public-rdf-text@w3.org
... Shall we change the section heading == Functions and Operators on <tt>rdf:text</tt> == to == Functions on <tt>rdf:text</tt> == ? we don't define any operators, after I have removed "equal" best, Axel Axel Polleres wrote: > Added both. (sent a message confirming this earlier already, but not > sure whether it got through, had some mail problem) > > Jos de Bruijn wrote: >> All, >> >> I propose to add the following two editor's notes to the rdf:text >> document so that the document can be published before resolving the >> issues I raised in my review of the document [1]. >> >> To section 3, below the specification of the lexical space, add an >> editor's note with the following text: >> >> The definition of the set of characters, particularly the fact that it >> is infinite, as well as the compatibility with xml string -- whether the >> string part of the lex & val space should be the same as xs:string -- >> are under discussion. >> >> To section 4.3.1 add an editor's note with the following text: >> >> The inclusion of text-length, as well as the definition of the function >> -- what should be the length of an rdf:text value -- are under >> discussion. >> >> >> Best, Jos >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html > > -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 01:38:34 UTC