- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:49:05 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On 1/21/22 12:01, Fabio Vitali wrote: > Hello. > > [...] >> Third, RDF-star has its own gotchas. The most discussed recently being the "multiple occurrences" problem (Liz and Richard marriages, Cleveland's presidencies), so you would still need to add the "additional node", even when using RDF-star... > Yes. I agree. > > But this problem is not shared by named graphs, and this is why we need a rdf-star-like structure to handle complex and compound statements, an rdf-star-named-graph or something. > [...] > Ciao > > Fabio I'm not convinced at all by this argument that there is a need for rdf-star here. Why not just use RDF reification? Or a good temporal logic? What is it about rdf-star that makes it needed here? peter
Received on Friday, 21 January 2022 18:49:19 UTC