I'm aware there are still semantics issues, but if they're potentially resolvable would it be possible to support both referentially transparent and referentially opaque statements by using a different syntax for each? So, I guess, something like: Referentially transparent statement: << S R O >> Referentially opaque statement: <<" S R O ">> With one usage rule: Transparent statements can only be nested in transparent statements. The rule means that once the <<" ">> delimiters are used everything inside, no matter how deeply nested, is also referentially opaque, which keeps things composable. Just asking because I saw Thomas' email <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2021May/0023.html> about the topic. Regards AnthonyReceived on Thursday, 10 February 2022 08:50:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 10 February 2022 08:50:41 UTC