- From: Miel Vander Sande <miel.vandersande@meemoo.be>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:37:36 +0100
- To: Laura Morales <lauretas@mail.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 08:38:17 UTC
Knowing that :knows is universal, I find this is more confusing in the same way Andy pointed out that :s :p "abc"@{ :a:b } . reads like modifying "abc". Plus, we are digressing from the triple model again and I don't think that will make things easier in the long run. RDF simply isn't PG and so is the syntax. With this thread in mind, the only minor change I see fit is going from {| |} to <| |> (or whatever other character to replace |) Op do 7 jan. 2021 om 08:40 schreef Laura Morales <lauretas@mail.com>: > What about this instead? > > :a :knows {:since 1900; :source "..."} :b . > > or > > :a :knows <<:since 1900; :source "...">> :b . > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2021 at 3:01 PM > > From: "thomas lörtsch" <tl@rat.io> > > To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de> > > Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org, "Miel Vander Sande" < > miel.vandersande@meemoo.be>, "Andy Seaborne" <andy@apache.org>, "Ghislain > ATEMEZING" <ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: A different symbol for {| > > > > +1 > >
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 08:38:17 UTC