W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > February 2021

Re: Additional authors on the CG draft?

From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:39:49 +0100
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>, Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ffa22897-8d41-4bdc-8a9f-0b4d26ea26f2.maildroid@localhost>
Dear Pavel,

As mentioned, I see the notion of authorship for this document as a broad concept.

Your input and your active participation in the discussions have helped shaping several aspects of what we have in the document now, and that's why I had proposed to include you.

@Pierre-Antoine, sure, I didn't mean to add anyone without their consent. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
Cc: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>, "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
Sent: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:06
Subject: Re: Additional authors on the CG draft?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:51 AM Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote:

> On 12 February 2021 21:54:05 CET, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I see "contributed to the document" broadly.
> I am fine with this.
> >
> >So, just off the top of my head I propose to include Andy, Gregg, Ted,
> >Eric P., Peter, Thomas, Ghislain, James, Pavel, Holger.
> I'd still prefer each author to confirm that they wish to be added (and
> give the affiliation that should be put, if any).

I don't really feel like I made any considerable contribution which'd merit
inclusion as an author. A footnote acknowledgement would be enough. I'm
with Stardog Union.


> >
> >If I am forgetting anyone, it is not deliberate. Just speak up.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Olaf
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
> >To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> >Sent: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:16
> >Subject: Additional authors on the CG draft?
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >we are about to release our first public draft of the RDF-star CG
> >report, and Olaf pointed out that the list of authors in the current
> >draft may not reflect accurately all the persons that contributed to
> >the
> >document.
> >
> >If you think that someone (including yourself), should be added to the
> >list of authors, please let me know by replying this e-mail. If your
> >name is proposed by someone else and you agree, please confirm (I will
> >not add anyone without their explicit consent).
> >
> >If your name comes after the first draft is published (I plan to do it
> >at some point in the week-end), don't despair -- it will be included in
> >
> >the next one!
> >
> >   best
> -- Sent from /e/ Mail.
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2021 13:40:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 13 February 2021 13:40:14 UTC