Re: Additional authors on the CG draft?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:51 AM Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote:

>
>
> On 12 February 2021 21:54:05 CET, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I see "contributed to the document" broadly.
>
> I am fine with this.
>
> >
> >So, just off the top of my head I propose to include Andy, Gregg, Ted,
> >Eric P., Peter, Thomas, Ghislain, James, Pavel, Holger.
>
> I'd still prefer each author to confirm that they wish to be added (and
> give the affiliation that should be put, if any).
>

I don't really feel like I made any considerable contribution which'd merit
inclusion as an author. A footnote acknowledgement would be enough. I'm
with Stardog Union.

Thanks,
Pavel


>
> >
> >If I am forgetting anyone, it is not deliberate. Just speak up.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Olaf
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
> >To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> >Sent: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:16
> >Subject: Additional authors on the CG draft?
> >
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >we are about to release our first public draft of the RDF-star CG
> >report, and Olaf pointed out that the list of authors in the current
> >draft may not reflect accurately all the persons that contributed to
> >the
> >document.
> >
> >If you think that someone (including yourself), should be added to the
> >list of authors, please let me know by replying this e-mail. If your
> >name is proposed by someone else and you agree, please confirm (I will
> >not add anyone without their explicit consent).
> >
> >If your name comes after the first draft is published (I plan to do it
> >at some point in the week-end), don't despair -- it will be included in
> >
> >the next one!
> >
> >   best
>
> -- Sent from /e/ Mail.
>
>