W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > December 2021

Re: multisets everywhere

From: Fabio Vitali <fabio.vitali@unibo.it>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:24:47 +0000
To: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
CC: "Patrick J. Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.org>, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
Message-ID: <88D0E6E1-108C-465C-B3DE-617C93405B25@unibo.it>
Dear Anthony: 

> If you think of graphs as just another type of statement, a compound statement, the extra-positions idea could be applied in the same way at the graph level:
> Simple statement:
> Subject Relation Object T1 T2 SpatialBound Certainty
> Compound statement:
> {
>     Statement1 AND
>     Statement2 AND
>     Statement3
> }.
>     T1 T2 SpatialBound Certainty
> For any graph to be valid the temporal and spatial bounds for its constituent statements would need to be within the bounds of the compound statement.

I like this. I like it a lot. It is very much in line with how I see things. 



Fabio Vitali                            Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly,
Dept. of Computer Science        Man got to sit and wonder "Why, why, why?'
Univ. of Bologna  ITALY               Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land,
phone:  +39 051 2094872              Man got to tell himself he understand.
e-mail: fabio@cs.unibo.it         Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007), "Cat's cradle"
Received on Sunday, 26 December 2021 17:25:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 26 December 2021 17:25:04 UTC