- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:53:42 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <9539be3f-329e-aba2-1ca7-99173daff008@openlinksw.com>
On 12/5/21 6:58 PM, David Booth wrote:
>>> On 12/3/21 6:31 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>>>> In my view, the impedance mismatch between RDF and PGs is not due
>>>> to some arbitrary restriction on the RDF model. It is due to the
>>>> fact that RDF is a logic, that can be represented as a graph, while
>>>> PG is a graph data model, without any semantic commitment.
>
> I respectfully but very much disagree. I see RDF being used to solve
> problems, just like PGs. And although I like RDF's grounding in
> semantics, I have never seen an RDF application that truly depended on
> that semantic grounding. Consider this:
>
> - For an application in which you control all of the data, clearly
> your application does not depend on RDF's semantics, because your
> application could just as well CHOOSE to apply RDF's semantics.
>
> - And for an application in which you do NOT control all of the data
> -- I'm thinking here primarily of Linked Data applications -- do you
> really think that those applications would not work if the data
> producers had published PGs for you to consume instead of RDF (and
> your application used PGs)? Personally, I seriously doubt it.
>
> Even with RDF's grounding in a standard semantics, every application
> developer who uses RDF from other sources needs to look carefully at
> that external data in advance to see if its semantics matches the
> needs of the application. Otherwise the application will likely
> produce garbage output. In other words, even though RDF itself has a
> standard semantic grounding, that grounding is no get-out-of-jail-free
> card to bypass the need to apply application-specific semantics.
>
> I have always viewed the most significant differences between RDF and
> PGs as being purely practical choices of graph representation. But
> maybe this is just a difference in perception?
>
> Best wishes,
> David Booth
>
Hi David,
What do you mean by "RDF Semantics" in regards to your comments above?
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers
Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
: http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 December 2021 14:53:57 UTC