- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:53:42 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <9539be3f-329e-aba2-1ca7-99173daff008@openlinksw.com>
On 12/5/21 6:58 PM, David Booth wrote: >>> On 12/3/21 6:31 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >>>> In my view, the impedance mismatch between RDF and PGs is not due >>>> to some arbitrary restriction on the RDF model. It is due to the >>>> fact that RDF is a logic, that can be represented as a graph, while >>>> PG is a graph data model, without any semantic commitment. > > I respectfully but very much disagree. I see RDF being used to solve > problems, just like PGs. And although I like RDF's grounding in > semantics, I have never seen an RDF application that truly depended on > that semantic grounding. Consider this: > > - For an application in which you control all of the data, clearly > your application does not depend on RDF's semantics, because your > application could just as well CHOOSE to apply RDF's semantics. > > - And for an application in which you do NOT control all of the data > -- I'm thinking here primarily of Linked Data applications -- do you > really think that those applications would not work if the data > producers had published PGs for you to consume instead of RDF (and > your application used PGs)? Personally, I seriously doubt it. > > Even with RDF's grounding in a standard semantics, every application > developer who uses RDF from other sources needs to look carefully at > that external data in advance to see if its semantics matches the > needs of the application. Otherwise the application will likely > produce garbage output. In other words, even though RDF itself has a > standard semantic grounding, that grounding is no get-out-of-jail-free > card to bypass the need to apply application-specific semantics. > > I have always viewed the most significant differences between RDF and > PGs as being purely practical choices of graph representation. But > maybe this is just a difference in perception? > > Best wishes, > David Booth > Hi David, What do you mean by "RDF Semantics" in regards to your comments above? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com Weblogs (Blogs): Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers Personal Weblogs (Blogs): Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ http://kidehen.blogspot.com Profile Pages: Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Web Identities (WebID): Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 December 2021 14:53:57 UTC