On 12/5/21 2:08 PM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > So even if we changed the RDF > abstract syntax to better align with the PG data model, I expect that > there would still be common PG patterns that would not map well to the > new RDF's semantics. I for one would be interested to see and understand such cases if anyone has some in mind, since they could be quite informative to the discussion. Thanks, David BoothReceived on Sunday, 5 December 2021 23:13:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 5 December 2021 23:13:41 UTC