- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2021 18:13:26 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On 12/5/21 2:08 PM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > So even if we changed the RDF > abstract syntax to better align with the PG data model, I expect that > there would still be common PG patterns that would not map well to the > new RDF's semantics. I for one would be interested to see and understand such cases if anyone has some in mind, since they could be quite informative to the discussion. Thanks, David Booth
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2021 23:13:39 UTC