W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > September 2020

Re: Annotation syntax [was: SPARQL* test suite]

From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 20:34:39 +0200
To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Message-ID: <1977720.PeQIPcoogU@porty3>
On lördag 5 september 2020 kl. 11:37:09 CEST Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
> > Le 4 sept. 2020 ā 00:30, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> a écrit
> > [...]
> > If RDF* in the most general sense is SA mode then the PG mode could be,
> > for example, called RDF+ aka RDF plus. It would be a bit like OWL Full vs
> > OWL DL, or SHACL-SPARQL vs SHACL Core. Some tools will elect to support
> > PG mode/RDF+ only.
>
> +1. I like this analogy. Probably RDF+ can confused some of us using RDFS+
> (as a profile to do reasoning). What about saying RDF* when you support
> both SA and PG (like OWL Full), then RDF*-XX (XX = SA or PG) if someone
> supports just one of them?

+1


-Olaf

 
> Best,
> Ghislain
> -----------------------------------
> Ghislain Atemezing
> http://atemezing.org <http://atemezing.org/>
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2020 18:35:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 5 September 2020 18:35:02 UTC