- From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 20:34:39 +0200
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On lördag 5 september 2020 kl. 11:37:09 CEST Ghislain Atemezing wrote: > > Le 4 sept. 2020 ā 00:30, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> a écrit > > [...] > > If RDF* in the most general sense is SA mode then the PG mode could be, > > for example, called RDF+ aka RDF plus. It would be a bit like OWL Full vs > > OWL DL, or SHACL-SPARQL vs SHACL Core. Some tools will elect to support > > PG mode/RDF+ only. > > +1. I like this analogy. Probably RDF+ can confused some of us using RDFS+ > (as a profile to do reasoning). What about saying RDF* when you support > both SA and PG (like OWL Full), then RDF*-XX (XX = SA or PG) if someone > supports just one of them? +1 -Olaf > Best, > Ghislain > ----------------------------------- > Ghislain Atemezing > http://atemezing.org <http://atemezing.org/>
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2020 18:35:00 UTC