- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:43:11 +0000
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On 11/12/2020 21:06, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2020, at 9:47 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> +1. I don't see how this can sensibly go forward without first having agreement about whether bracketed triples are asserted. As yet it looks indistinguishable from being a special syntax for an unnamed "named graph" that is limited to a single triple.
>
> My understanding is that << … >> triples are _not_ automatically asserted. They are asserted using {! … |}.
>
> An N-Triples* syntax would only have << … >>, and graph isomorphism would need to be updated to consider that, so we can express the results of parsing Turtle* (or whatever*) in terms of N-Triples*/Quads*.
+1 - that is my understanding as well.
Andy
Received on Saturday, 12 December 2020 12:43:27 UTC