W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > December 2020

Re: Agenda for 2020-12-11

From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:43:11 +0000
To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Message-ID: <65ae7279-354a-d639-915c-41d4a1e04e50@apache.org>


On 11/12/2020 21:06, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2020, at 9:47 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>>

>>
>> +1.  I don't see how this can sensibly go forward without first having agreement about whether bracketed triples are asserted.  As yet it looks indistinguishable from being a special syntax for an unnamed "named graph" that is limited to a single triple.
> 
> My understanding is that << … >> triples are _not_ automatically asserted.  They are asserted using {! … |}.
> 
> An N-Triples* syntax would only have << … >>, and graph isomorphism would need to be updated to consider that, so we can express the results of parsing Turtle* (or whatever*) in terms of N-Triples*/Quads*.

+1 - that is my understanding as well.

     Andy
Received on Saturday, 12 December 2020 12:43:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 12 December 2020 12:43:28 UTC