Re: Agenda for 2020-12-11

On 12/11/20 11:59 AM, Lassila, Ora wrote:
 > I am with Peter on this. Particularly, discussions of syntax
 > are hard for me when I don't know exactly what's "behind the
 > syntax" (and I get these horrible flashbacks to RDF M+S WG).

+1.  I don't see how this can sensibly go forward without first having 
agreement about whether bracketed triples are asserted.  As yet it looks 
indistinguishable from being a special syntax for an unnamed "named 
graph" that is limited to a single triple.

David Booth

Received on Friday, 11 December 2020 17:48:09 UTC