- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 11:10:16 +0000
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
I followed the convention of the semantics test suite.
There are problems with two very similar MIME types (file extensions).
do we expect text/turtle-star to imply there definitely is <<>> in the
data? (needing to scan the data first)
or that a TTL* capable system sends back text/turtle-star always to be
safe? That breaks current clients.
(adding a new directive Turtle has similar difficulties as well as a new
one - c.f. XML - choosing the parser after starting the parser)
Holger - how would TopBraid handle the MIME type choice?
Andy
On 06/12/2020 01:55, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> On 6/12/2020 4:11 am, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> DONE:
>> > ACTION: andys to add a test-suite for Turtle*
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax
>
> Should these have a different file ending, such as ttls?
>
> Holger
>
>
>>
>> These are initial input for syntax tests for triple terms: << >> with
>> both positive and negative tests. As syntax tests these are not
>> defining the resulting RDF.
>>
>> In addition, there are two about triple annotation:
>>
>> turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl
>> turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl
>>
>> There is a companion GH issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/53
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
Received on Sunday, 6 December 2020 11:10:31 UTC