- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:05:27 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
good afternoon; On 2020-12-01, at 12:01:47, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote: > > James, > > ... > > Second, the very idea of SP is to have single-use predicates, and consider them as identifying the only triple in which they appear. the singleton predicate designates a set of triples. > By contrast, Jerven's suggestion would allow the same triple to be used in predicate position multiple times, but most importantly, to be used as the predicate of a triple whose subject and object are different from its own subject and object: > :s2 << :s1 :p :o1 >> :o2. > :s3 << :s1 :p :o1 >> :o3. > What on earth that would mean, I have absolutely no idea! [1] discussed that at length. where a predicate iri is understood to designate a triple set rather than the statement(s) in which it appears, why should it be restricted to appear in one statement only.? … >> --- >> [1] >> https://mor2.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/pdf/2014-www-vn.pdf >> >> [2] >> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1912/paper12.pdf >> >> --- >> james anderson | >> james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2020 12:05:41 UTC