- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:11:11 -0400
- To: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Cc: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <FF9AFCA5-C325-4F6A-B307-9758BA2FAA3E@openlinksw.com>
On Sep 3, 2019, at 04:13 PM, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote: > > However, the aspect of RDF* that you mention exists only when using RDF*/SPARQL* in PG mode. It is not clear yet whether we end up with proposing only PG mode, or only SA mode, or maybe both as alternative options. Setting all else aside, I cannot be the only person whose eyes and mind are glazing over a bit trying to keep track of RDF* vs RDF*/PG vs RDF*/SA vs RDF. RDF is an acronym, from "Resource Description Framework". RDF* is ... an acronym plus a splat? "Resource Description Framework Star"? And how are we to read the Modes -- "RDF-star Property Graph Mode" and "RDF-star separate-assertions mode", or PG-Mode (which puts me in mind of the USA's motion picture rating system)? As I'm reading this thread, these appear to be mutually incompatible -- but there's no obvious signal as to which mode is active on any given TURTLE* file (and what will that file's extension be? Clearly, `TTL*` won't work, as it's both 4 characters, and includes a special.) SPARQL* and TURTLE* hit me similarly. Some will dismissively say this is just bikeshedding, but good naming matters, especially when things that *look* very similar must be interpreted very differently -- such as TURTLE* vs TURTLE. Even in this thread, RDF*/SA interpretations have been applied (by the only person who could really be familiar with them) to data which was meant (to the degree that the rest of us can do so) to be read as RDF*/PG (since that's the only significantly publicly presented mode to date). This sort of ambiguity leads to misinterpretation, misunderstanding, lowered uptake, heightened confusion, and I fear, to an increased derogation of any Semantic Web. Just some further thoughts, as I try to keep up with this list. Ted -- A: Yes. http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32 Senior Support & Evangelism // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com // http://twitter.com/TallTed OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ 20 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 322, Burlington MA 01803 Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ Community -- https://community.openlinksw.com/ LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/ Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 00:11:41 UTC