- From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:19:56 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
- CC: thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
Thomas, On fredag 30 augusti 2019 kl. 19:03:16 CEST thomas lörtsch wrote: > Am 30. August 2019 14:04:32 MESZ schrieb Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>: > > [...] > > > > <http://example.org/Alice> rdf:type foaf:Person . > > <http://example.org/Alice> foaf:name "Alice" . > > <http://example.org/Alice> :claims <http://example.org/Bob> . > > <http://example.org/Bob> rdf:type foaf:Person . > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:name "Bob" . > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:age "23"^^xsd:integer . > > > >Perhaps now it becomes more apparent that, according to this data, > >person Alice claims the person Bob (who is of age 23). This is > >different than saying that person Alice makes the following claim: > >the thing denoted by IRI is a person named Bob who is of age 23. > > No, it's the same. To me it's not the same. > The situation may change when you want to describe > Alice's claiming activity. Claiming something as such is no different from > liking, being located in etc. You wouldn't insist on putting the objects of > such statements in parentheses. Something like > > ex:Alice ex:likes [ a foaf:Person; foaf:name "Bob" ] > > would be perfectly alright, wouldn't it? Assuming that the IRI ex:Alice is supposed to denote a person named Alice, then the natural interpretation of these example triples (at least for me) would be the following: Person Alice likes a person named Bob. Again, for me that's different from saying: Person Alice likes that there exists a person named Bob. Olaf > Actually we had a similar discussion already a few mails back and we agreed > (I think) that you can model everything with pure triples. You don't *need* > meta modelling (I never thought I would write that one day) if you nest > your triples deep enough, although abstraction through meta modelling > certainly can be very helpful. If the conversation itself is about meta > modelling then it can be had with pure basic triples. > > > Cheers, > Thomas
Received on Friday, 30 August 2019 19:20:23 UTC