- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 17:23:56 +0200
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
good afternoon; the fork of https://github.com/afs/SPARQL-exists at https://github.com/datagraph/SPARQL-exists now includes a branch (with-dataset-declarations) which contains an additional directory for test tools. these are - run-sparql-tests.mjs to run the tests against a remote endpoint and record the results locally - summarize-sparql-results.mjs to collate the results into an html summary. the html document is present as "summary.html" at the top-level. it is not as detailed as an earl report, but does provide for convenient comparisons among divergent results. i corresponded with peter in an effort to include his results, but their encoding in the posted earl reports does not lend itself readily to displays and comparisons. best regards, from berlin., > On 23. May 2025, at 15:49, James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com> wrote: > > good afternoon; > > would it be feasible to add a results folder as a sibling to the tests and record the results for each location in a subfolder. > > the screen. below, illustrates the layout. > > this would make it possible to have a utility which generates something like the summary page, below. > > >> On 16. May 2025, at 22:31, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Where should the results of running the SPARQL EXISTS tests on engines go? >> >> I have results for MillenniumDB, QLever, and Virtuoso Open Source. >> >> peter >> >> > > --- > james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com > > <Screenshot 2025-05-23 at 15.47.36.png> > <summary.html> --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2025 15:24:13 UTC