Identifying issues to solve before CR

Dear all,

we need to request Horizontal Review [1] of the documents that we plan to bring to Candidate Recommendation (rdf-concepts, rdf-n-triples, rdf-semantics). As discussed in our last meeting [2], we don't need to send the other groups a completely finished version, but we need to signal all issues that may still lead to changes in the documents.

We decided that in the next focused meeting [3] on Aug 7, we would collectively decide on the list of issues we consider must be addressed before CR on each document, and mark them with the 'ms:CR' label.

By then, we ask everyone to review the open issues. The first person to express an opinion on an issue should create a comment "should be resolved before CR" and add a +1 (thumbs up) or a -1 (thumbs down). Others will record their opinion on the same comment by simply adding +1 or -1 on it. (Feel free of course to add more comments below if you want to develop your argument.)

If you add +1 to an issue and it does not have the 'ms:CR' tag, please also add it so that the issues with some proponents are easily identified.

Thanks in advance,

   the chairs of the RDF & SPARQL WG

[1] https://www.w3.org/guide/documentreview/#how-to-get-horizontal-review

[2] https://www.w3.org/2025/07/24-rdf-star-minutes.html#5f4d

[3]https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/3145be7b-99e7-49af-90b0-aee845dc7b2d/20250807T120000/


--
Dr. Ora Lassila
Principal Technologist, Amazon Neptune